Gavros 12:50 Wed Oct 24
McCann's statement analysis
|
|
Very long (in fact you can miss out the first fourty minutes which is an introduction of statement analysis. What follows is a remarkable analysis of an interview with the McCanns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uS6ucYudNAo&t=88s
|
|
|
Replies - In Chronological Order ( Show Newest Messages First)
Takashi Miike
12:53 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
by the north american bloke? yes, i watched it a while back. it's very good
|
happygilmore
12:58 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
I'll wait for the Netflixs documentary
|
Gavros
12:58 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
that's the one. very interesting, especially the sort of Freudian stuff about teeth and windows etc suggesting an abuse angle.
|
Takashi Miike
1:03 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
the body language ones on those two are good too, not sure if they're still up as the bird's channel was banned/taken down as it was clearly upsetting certain people :.)
|
claret on my shirt
2:48 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
After watching that yeah they are guilty as hell. I worry if my boy comes home late from the pub, they don't even mention her when she has just been supposedly taken
|
Mr Kenzo
8:19 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Not this shit again
|
BubblesCyprus
8:24 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Same Thread same shit different year.
Guilty as hell the pair of them with a healthy bank balance for thier efforts.
|
CanningTownWA
9:07 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Not sure on the link for YouTube I got a horror movie?
|
Trevor B
9:09 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Canning
One of the McCann's family holiday films?
|
LeroysBoots
9:11 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Whilst watching The Cry recently I thought of them, covering up an accident, totally plausible
She seems to be in awe of him
|
Westham67
10:08 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Interesting .I always thought they had sedated the poor girl and she died and they covered it up, nasty cunts
|
Mr Anon
10:10 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Interesting, but slightly cheapened by the presences of Richard Hall who is a complete crank
|
penners28
12:47 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
I find this a very interesting topic. It's odd the people, like myself, who believe they are guilty as hell get stick for even suggesting this....when there it's just as plausible they they did it versus an abduction?
People also mention how they could have done it, but wasnt she last seen at like 3pm that afternoon? That game them plenty of time to dispose and concoct the "abduction" theory.
My pal is a detective in the Thames Valley force and told me 90% of the old bill reckon they did it, but the Portuguese made such a hash of the investigation there is little reliable evidence. However in terms of timelines, body language, and more importantly the behavior of the parents, it makes the abduction story extremely far fetched.
|
,
12:53 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Oh yes, the old bill have a tremendous record for thinking that someone is guilty. Fortunately for the McCanns this all happened in Portugal but had it been here the old bill, as we know from previous episodes, would have likely adjusted evidence and “found” more evidence to back up their “think they are guilty” hunch.
|
penners28
12:59 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
You mean like Karen Matthews and Mick Phillpott for example? Where they set traps for them to trip themselves up?
The old bill aint perfect, far from it, but they have experts who deal with these kinds of cases on a daily basis. Like I said, I find it odd that people can get so aggravated with others thinking the parents are guilty when there is basically no evidence of an abduction, and holes in their story.
|
,
1:10 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
You can prosecute if you have evidence to conclude beyond reasonable doubt. Take a civil if you feel they are guilty on the balance of probabilities. Otherwise you can speculate with others who feel they are guilty but have no proof.
The McCanns are in the position where instead of anyone proving they are guilty of something they, themselves, have to try constantly to prove their innocence.
For me they are guilty of putting their children at risk by their action.
|
mashed in maryland
1:15 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Was a thread on TWITTER doing the rounds a few days back about this.
Can't find it, but I'm sure someone else can dig it out.
Apparently some famous celeb chef/paedo lived very close to the resort and they were mates with him, or something.
|
penners28
1:26 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Out of interest, how have the mccanns constantly tried to prove their innocence? By calling anyone who dares question them trolls? By refusing to answer all those questions?
All they have tried to do is increase their profile and sell books, in my opinion.
|
Gavros
1:30 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
As this and others have said over the years, the one key defining thing with the McCann's in interview has been their defensiveness about their original story, as opposed to parental concern for a child that they would have us believe is still alive. The fact that they show no level of concern for her is what has led many professionals to concluded that they know she is beyond care, and to know that they have to know that she died on the day she went missing.
|
Swiss.
1:36 Wed Oct 24
Re: McCann's statement analysis
|
Why still covering this? It's bloody obvious she died while they were out, accident and they covered it up.
|
| 
